1.
Content is King
2. Links:
Quality matters more than Quantity 3. Never
assume visitors are stupid. 4. Read
The Guidelines 5. Be
Unique, Be Proud And Be Happy 6. Never
assume that search engines are stupid 7. Never
submit to directories; submit to Quality Directories - know the difference 8.
If your use of
key words looks silly - it almost certainly is. 9. If
you own a quality domain name, then use it. 10. Divide
your site and be conquered. 11. If
you use Meta Tags, then use them correctly. 12. Don't
Rock The Boat When You Permanently Redirect. 13. Clients
whose sites get banned will probably not pay. 14. More
than one hyphen is international shorthand for idiot webmaster; More than two
hyphens is Galaxy-wide shorthand for "I'd be a spammer if only I knew how" 15.
Always buy domain.com,
if only to permanently redirect it to domain.somethingelse 16.
Beware of Geeks
Bearing Gifs 18. Article
Farming Helps the Farmer More Than the Turkey 19. http://www.domain.com/
is the single most important URL on your site. 21. Always
buy similar-sounding domain names. 23. Standard
Forms Should Never Be Used. 24. Never
place an undisguised email address on a web site. 27. Always
consider buying domains with similar names to yours. 34. There
is no point submitting any page to a search engine. 42. Maintain
a sense of humour at all times. Please Note:I didn't invent
most of these laws; I collected them. And I'm arrogantly adding my name to them
(see Quadrille's
42nd Law) In one or two cases, a few individuals noticed them, and asserted
them in the face of ritual humiliation from others - but mostly, they are a consensus
view, built up over a couple of years activity in SEO forums. These are,
generally, good laws - but as in real life, there are exceptions; while the 14th
Law depracates hyphens, if file names are cities, then Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
should never be left out, and if madonna.htm is ok, then so is carole-bayer-sager.htm In
reality, a more useful title for the page would be would be "Quadrille's
Old Chestnuts", as these can be used as stock responses to those who join
a forum to ask a burning question that has been answered 30 times before. This
week alone. But that title doesn't sound so good! Quadrille's
Oft-Quoted First LawContent
is King No, of course I didn't invent this one - but any set of
Internet laws must include it - and it must be at #1. Bill
Gates said it in 1996, and all credit to him; he was right then, and he's
right now. Other factors matter - but the single most important feature of any
web site is the content. Read Bill's words, ten years on ... Quadrille's
Oft-Quoted Second LawLinks: Quality matters more than Quantity Not
the old 'Content is King, Links are the Queen'; these days links come with a price.
While it is essential that you have links, in order to get a search engine listing,
and to climb up the results, it is also essential that the majority of those links
are relevant, from quality sites, and not part of a reciprocation deal - if they
are to be a benefit, not a hindrance to your site. Quadrille's
Oft-Quoted Third LawNever assume visitors are stupid. The
'average surfer' does not have all the inside info that many SEO folk take for
granted - but they are not stupid, and certain site behaviours often raise suspicions;
uber-long-hyphenated file names, just like pages of waffle and stuffed keywords
are increasingly recognised; indeed, any 'trick' that's been around a while will
show diminishing returns. respecting your reader's intelligence, plus plain old
fashioned honesty never quite went out of fashion: Visitor Respect is The New
Black Quadrille's Oft-Quoted Fourth LawRead
The Guidelines Search engines and directories have guidelines. They
are there to help you get the best out of that search engine. Find them. Read
them. Eat the page. This Law is the Internet's best kept secret.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted Fifth LawBe Unique, Be Proud And Be Happy Unique
works on the Internet, and nothing works better. One unique article on your own
site is worth 1000 rehashed clone articles on 100 article farms. And you'll feel
better, too. Quadrille's Oft-Quoted Sixth LawNever
assume that search engines are stupid It's not unusual for Google-bashers
to whine about somerecent stupidity of the monolithic search engine. In most cases,
that's a sign of an idiot who has been caught stealing the family silver, who
hasn't got the sense to keep his mouth shut. Search engines are not, of
course, perfect - but most of what they do has a reason, and usually the tweaks
do what's intended. So when someone moans that his perfect site has been penalized
because of a stupid SE cockup, first take a large pinch of salt - then ask for
a URL to check. If it's not forthcoming, it's usually for the obvious reason -
the site would tell a different story Quadrille's Oft-Quoted
Seventh LawNever submit to directories; submit to Quality Directories
- and know the difference There are tens of thousands of general directories,
95% of which are little more than link exchanges or 'made for advertising' clones.
None of that lot have any SEO value, and could damage your site. It is only
that small group of quality directories that matters in any way; choose them yourself,
or use a submission service that demonstrates that it understands the difference. Find
out about Quality Directories Quadrille's
Oft-Quoted Eighth LawIf your use of key words looks silly - it almost
certainly is. Search engines set out to emulate the user experience;
as keyword counting is not difficult for computer programs, you can be confident
that SEs will notice 'excessive' use of key words or phrases. SEs look at the
whole page - all the shared copy, links etc., as well as that page's 'unique content'.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted Ninth LawIf you own a quality domain name, then
use it - or you may find the quality was an illusion In general, using
a strong name is the best defense against having the name undermined by another
site; but trademark ownership trumps almost very hand.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted Tenth LawDivide your site and be conquered. There's
a myth going around that starting multiple sites on one topic is somehow a good
SEO 'trick'. Nothing could be further from the truth. If you have one topic, much
better to have one site, removing all risk, halving your marketing / seo effort,
and concentrating your ranking strength. A divided site means incoming links
will be divided between domains, rather than all coming to one - further damaging
your ability to do well in search engine rankings. And there is zero doubt
that duplicating your own pages increases marketing effort, reduces ranking, and
often confuses customers. There really is no good reason for dividing your efforts. The
same applies with multiple sub-domains; it may work for the Big Guys - it's most
unlikely to work for you. It has been suggested that the 'one site rule'
could be damaging; "All eggs in one basket and all that." I think that's
a matter of conscience. I never heard of a sound and safe site having anything
to fear; it's the naughty boys who stand to lose by this rule! The single caveat
is to keep an eye on Google; search engine advice does change. Not enough, ever,
to destroy a site that has always been clean - but over a period of time, the
emphasis does change, and things that never mattered, suddenly do. On balance,
for the up-to-date webmaster, Divide your site and be conquered.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 11th Law If you use Meta Tags, then use them
correctly - failure to do this may lead to duplicate page problems, ugly SE listings
and conceivably, pages not being listed at all. Many search engines
and directories use part or all of the meta description in their results listings;
an absent meta description may lead to 'raw code' being shown instead; keyword
packing results in an ugly listing too, while identical or absent meta descriptions
(or identical title tags) can lead to absent or supplementary listings. Meta keywords
are currently used by few search engines. But that could change tomorrow.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 12th Law Don't rock the boat when you 301;redirect
from site to site, keep filenames and folders the same, avoid major changes to
content. A 301 permanent redirect will transfer people following 'old'
links; but to do well in the long term, the 'new' site needs links of its own. While
you will get 'lost people' with the 301, you will not transfer any 'Google benefit',
if you have changed the structure and content; you are not transferring 'like
for like', but are tranferring from old to new. And new pages/sites will always
be subject to a the 'aging delay' before full benefit. 301s work best when
they are domain to domain, and nothing changes. So visitors go from www.domain1/folder1/filename.htm
to www.domain2/folder1/filename.htm, where filename.htm has NOT substantially
changed. Every deviation from that level of simplicity risks reducing the benefit
of the 301. Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 13th LawClients
whose sites get banned will probably not pay. It's always worth remembering
that risks or experiments on a client's site should never happen without the client's
full understanding and consent. Many SEOs who like to 'push the envelope' learn
this the hard way. Clients may push for results, but there are no shortcuts to
good SEO Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 14th LawMore
than one hyphen is international shorthand for idiot webmaster; More than two
hyphens is Galaxy-wide shorthand for "I'd be a spammer if only I knew how" Who's
counting? Not me. But it's the look of the thing; would you really spend money
at http://my-wonderful-domain.info/my-supa-folda/And-anotherfolda/boring-file.com?
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 15th LawAlways buy domain.com, if only to permanently
redirect it to domain.somethingelse There are very few honest guarantees
in this business (plenty of dishonest ones) - but losing out to the .com ranks
up there with the best of them: it's a dead cert. Dot coms have many structural
advantages; in browsers, in search and in visitors minds. Few people looking for
a dot com accidentally get the dot net - but many who wanted the .net will end
up on the .com. In most cases, using the .com is also preferable, the main
exceptions being non-US local sites, and some non-English sites.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 16th LawBeware of Geeks Bearing Gifs Not
really an attack on geeks, who can't help being what they are (any more than you
can help being what you are), nor an attack on GIFs. Just a punny reminder
that the web is a dangerous place; if someone promises something that seems too
good to be true, then it almost certainly is. For those that need to know,
the saying is from Virgil; Timeo Danaos et dona ferentis - "I fear
the Greeks even bringing gifts" (usually mistranslated as Beware of Greeks
Bearing Gifts). Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 18th LawArticle
Farming Helps the Farmer More Than the Turkey Advice to post articles
on article farming sites works on the shakey premise that the farm has a good
standing with the search engines. That is very rarely the case. In fact,
very few article farms figure in the search engine results, and even if yours
does okay, it's unlikely to help your article much, and even less likely to help
the link to your site. Additionally, few article directories get many human
visitors, so the number of direct referrals will be small. Your article
will help the article farmer of course. Quadrille's Oft-Quoted
19th Lawhttp://www.domain.com/ is the single most important URL on
your site. Using it enables people to find your site quickly and easily,
and will get much better search engine placement, if used wisely, than any other
URL. A redirect from http://www.domain.com/ to http://www.domain.com/folder/page-number-346.asp
(or worse) is one of the most SEO-unfriendly acts you can perform
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 21st LawAlways buy similar-sounding domain names.
When you buy a domain name, always buy similar sounding names, and similar spellings,
as a defence against someone else getting it. If you don't, a domain squatter,
a malware-ridden MFA site, or even a porn merchant might get it.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 23rd LawStandard Forms Should Never Be Used. Standard
forms, on forums, guest books or anywhere else, are an invitation to spammers;
they have software that enables them to submit boring rubbish endlessly, simply
by knowing your form's URL. These industrial strength form-spammers are too stupid
to understand 'nofollow', and really don't care if you remove their rubbish -
they submit to thousands, on the basis that a handful will stick. One day, they'll
learn that even those few really don't help them, but hey-ho! These idiots
do not 'individualize' their attacks to each site; they have all the details set
up for standard form fields, and simply add your URL. So in the form code, instead
of input=name, put input=aardvark; instead of email, put sandpaper ... and so
on. In 95% of cases, this will either eliminate the spam completely, or
result in a 'blank entry', which will not cause offence or irritation to your
visitors, and can be removed at your leisure. Quadrille's
Oft-Quoted 24th LawNever place an undisguised email address on a web
site. It's just an invitation to spammers. Use a simple javascript snippet
to obfuscate the address in the page code, while still appearing to visitors -
and still working. If you are concerned about those who will not use javascript
(all 22 of them), then use an image like this:
. The downside is that some users will not bother to copy it, and it may also
go out of date (like the one in the example). Quadrille's
Oft-Quoted 27th LawAlways consider buying domains with similar names
to yours ... before someone else does. Not worth bidding hundreds of
dollars - but if you have bluewidgets.com, then a few dollars to secure blue-widgets.com
may save heartache later. I'd also recommend considering .net and your country
tld too (eg bluewidgets.co.uk). The 15th Law already advises
you to buy domain.com, if only to permanently redirect it to domain.somethingelse
- but widening your net - depending on your finances - is a wise move. The best
defense of a domin name is, of course, registering it as a trademark.
Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 34th Law There is no point submitting any page
to a search engine. The only effective way to get a listing that sticks
is to have at least one link to the page, from a page already listed in google.
Pages may show up if you submit them, but they may not stay for long - and they
will never do well in other people's searches without links. Getting links
and building your site is a much better way to spend your time than submitting;
the SEs will do it for you if you have links - and usually just as quickly as
you can! Quadrille's Oft-Quoted 42nd LawMaintain
a sense of humour at all times. Quadrille's Oft-Quoted
Laws are subject to renumbering on a rational, irrational and random basis - but
usually to try and get some order of priority. This page is subject to updating
as and when New Laws are Handed Down. First Published: 20 August 2006 -
last updated 9 July 2008 This article may be published elswhere, provided
this footnote is included as is, with a live link to the source: http://www.sick-site-syndrome.com/articles/ |